COAT advocates for accessibility and usability of technology for people with disabilities. Enacting the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (21st CVAA) was a huge step forward and we are working to implement this new law. COAT’s overall aim is to ensure accessibility, usability, and affordability of all broadband, wireless, and Internet technologies for people with disabilities.
COAT Position Statement: Mandate Hearing Aid Compatibility for End-User Voice Equipment Used with Internet-Based Technologies
COAT recommendation: Extend current federal law requiring hearing aid compatibility on newly manufactured and imported telephones to end user VoIP and other Internet-enabled telephone products that, like telephones used over the public switched telephone network, have acoustic handsets or headphones and that enable voice communication over the Internet.
Who will benefit? There are over 6 million users of hearing aids and cochlear implants who need hearing aid compatible telephones in the United States. An additional 25 million Americans have some degree of hearing loss and do not wear hearing aids or cochlear implants, but may benefit from volume amplification. As increasing numbers of the baby boomer generation are projected to develop hearing loss in the coming years, this number is likely to increase.
Current law: The Telecommunications Act for the Disabled Act of 1982, as amended by PL 100-394, the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988 is codified at 47 U.S.C. § 610. This statute requires all essential telephones and all telephones manufactured in or imported into the United States to be hearing aid compatible. The mandates apply to all wireline and cordless telephones and certain wireless digital telephones. Hearing aid compatible telephones provide inductive and acoustic connections that allow individuals with hearing aids and cochlear implants to communicate by phone. To achieve inductive coupling, the telephone must emit sufficient electromagnetic energy to couple with a telecoil in the hearing aid or the cochlear implant processor. When activated, the telecoil converts the magnetic field into sound and the hearing aid or cochlear implant microphone is simultaneously turned off or reduced to eliminate or decrease any background noise or feedback that can make it difficult to hear speech. Acoustic coupling uses the microphone in the hearing aid or cochlear implant to pick up and amplify sounds from the telephone’s receiver. Under FCC rules, in order to be considered hearing aid compatible, telephones used with digital wireless technologies must also minimize electromagnetic interference, which has the effect of creating additional noise that makes it difficult to understand speech.
Why it is not enough: Recent communications with manufacturers of new Internet-enabled telephones reveal that these companies believe that they are not covered by the existing HAC mandates. The struggles to achieve universal HAC telephones date back to the mid-1970s. These struggles have entailed repeated attempts to preserve hearing aid compatibility as new generations of telephones have been introduced into the American marketplace. For example, hearing aid compatibility was threatened in the 1960s and 1970s when AT&T replaced its “U” type receiver with an “L” type receiver, in the 1980s when inexpensive phones from overseas began flooding the U.S. markets, and in the 1990s, when digital wireless devices were introduced in America. At each of these junctures, the newer phones emitted insufficient electromagnetic energy to achieve inductive coupling, provided too much interference, or otherwise posed problems for hearing aid wearers who previously had been fully able to use telephones. Federal legislation is again needed to ensure HAC access in current and future generations of Internet-based phone innovations.
Technical and Economic Feasibility: As holds true for any type of accessibility, the costs and efforts associated with incorporating HAC design will be substantially lower if this is required now, as new Internet-enabled devices are being conceived and developed, rather than later, when costly and burdensome retrofits will become necessary.
To support the work of COAT, make a donation today!









Closed Caption button on remote.
I tested a new voicemail
I tested a new voicemail service that does transcription for the hearing impaired and can be read by cell phone text message or by computer e-mail. Don’t be surprised if “transcription for the hearing impaired” becomes “sandwich on for hearing in pairs.“ I keep thinking I am going to write an entire blog of nothing but the malapropisms of captions and transcriptions. Those of us who depend on them are side-splittingly familiar with these sometimes outrageous “best guesses” and hilarious homonyms. Somebody should coin a special new word or phrase for this phenomenon. Maybe somebody already has, and it just got mangled in translation.
Testcall: Hello yes ... ... this is me ... hope all is well and ... I'm checking out this ... voicemail transcription…. I just want to let you know that my grand son Chance ... Watches Sponge Bob Square Pants ... Or would watch it 24/7 on the television or close to that much ... this is a test and ... the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog’s back ... 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.
Transcription: Hello yes ... ... this is louise ... hope all is well and ... I'm checking out this ... voicemail sandwich on…. I just want to let you know that my grand son chance ... walk to sponge bob square pants ... boardwalk to 247 on that or ally will both that much ... this is a test and ... the quick brown fox just over the lazy dog bye ... warren to 3 for 5 6 southwest I 9 tate ron.
I’m not trying to kill the messenger. The most recent Oxford English Dictionary (Second Edition, 1989) was printed in 20 volumes, consisting of 291,500 entries in 21,730 pages. Add the quirks and varieties of spoken accents: Georgia, Texas, New York, California, India, England. Even in today’s world of gigabit computer technology, the human element itself is daunting.
I was very excited to read about You Mail, a new voicemail service offering a free trial and promising “nearly-perfect” transcriptions delivered by cell phone and computer as a text message and e-mail. If you like it, you can get as many as 50 messages per month for $6.99. Basically your phone has to be set to forward unanswered calls to You Mail instead of your regular voicemail. Any time you want to switch back, all you have to do is stop the call forwarding.
Your callers hear this message: “Your voicemail is being transcribed by You Mail. Please speak clearly.” All y’all. A text transcription of the voicemail message rings your cell phone quicker than you can search for it in your pockets or hunt in your purse. Computer e-mail delivery is not quite as fast but only just not quite. What You Mail calls “near perfect” transcriptions are no worse than cable television captions.
The cell phone I carry is a pre-paid, a great savings for me, because I only use it for emergency and brief messages. However, my pre-paid plan does not allow call forwarding, so I could not use You Mail without changing plans. My cell phone service also charges $0.20 per text message. I am looking into another plan with texts, call minutes, and long distance unlimited for a flat rate of $40 per month. I would have to add the call forwarding option for another $5.
HSBC bank has now added
HSBC bank has now added induction loops on the teller line at the following three branches of this bank:
Washington DC Office 1130 Connecticut Ave NW Washington, DC 20036
Jamestown - WS Branch 417 Spring Street Jamestown, New York 14701
West Henrietta - Branch 3740 W Henrietta Road Rochester, New York 14623
Thanks, for the good
Thanks, for the good articles ...I am very intiresting..